Re: Getting rid of Group Header
"Roy J. Tellason" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Organization | as necessary |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 16 February 2009 02:50:31 pm Anne Wilson wrote: > On Monday 16 February 2009 16:55:45 John Aldrich wrote: > > On Monday 16 February 2009, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > As far as I know, nothing like that is hard-coded. Calm down, John :-) > > > Try this. > > > > > > Have you found the Aggregation icon? Second from the right after the > > > search bar. Select Activity by Date, Threaded. Then hit Configure. > > > On the Groups, Threads and Sorting tab, set Groups to None. Set > > > Threading to Perfect by Reference and Subject. While you're there, see > > > if there's anything else you want to change. > > > > > > The more options we have, the more we need complex ways of changing > > > them. Sad, but true. > > > > <rant> > > Thanks, Anne. However, I would like to know who's brilliant idea it was > > to make grouping the default? I mean, if it ain't broke, why fix it? I > > realize that there are likely people who are glad that KMail looks so > > much more like Microsoft LookOut... err... Outlook out of the box, so to > > speak, and that's fine, but whose brilliant idea was it to make that the > > default look "out of the box"? > > > > I agree, it's nice to have more configuration options, but why did they > > have to hide it all in three or four different places? Why not just have > > it all under Tools ->"Configure KMail"? That's the *logical* place for > > all that, but now we have to go to a bunch of different places to > > configure the look / feel of KMail. IMNSHO, that's poor design, and > > whoever came up with that plan ought to be forced to go work for > > Microsoft if they like the Microsoft approach to configuration so much! > > </rant!> > > > > Seriously, why does it have to be so difficult to just have a plain, > > simple threaded message list? Is that too much to ask? Sheesh! > > > > For this outrage, I sentence the offending programmer(s) to 1 year > > debugging Microsoft code! ;-) > > I neither know nor care what Microsoft's application looks like. I have > never used it. Come to think of it, I think the only M$ application I've > ever used was my grandson's package with which he made birthday cards, as a > child. What is more to the point is that many people have appreciated the > changes. They don't suit me, but as long as I can switch them off, that's > OK. Any sentencing I do will be on people who want everyone to work their > way :-) > > Anne Oh yeah? I'd _still_ like to know how to turn off that arbitrary packing of message areas that happens whenever the heck it decides to, whether I want it to or not. Granted, it's not quite as much of an enumbrance on this 1 GHz machine as it was on the 500 MHz machine I was using before, but there are still times when I'm typing and it gets interrupted, or when I start typing and I have to wait a while before any of it appears on the screen. It's a wait, it's wasting my time, and it's bloody unnecessary, particularly since it seems to pack folders that I've only _written_ to, and not deleted anything from! That got put in a few versions back, and there's no bloody way to turn it off, and it's bloody annoying! [/rant] -- Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters" - Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James M Dakin