Re: To which calendar does an event belong?
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Guido Pinkernell wrote: > Hi, > > Am Sonntag 17 Mai 2009 15:06:04 schrieb Ingo Klöcker: > > Hi, > > > > Please always state what version you are using. > > Presently KDE 4.2.3 (release 116) on openSUSE 11.1 > > > On Sunday 17 May 2009, Guido Pinkernell wrote: > > > Am Sonntag 17 Mai 2009 13:03:02 schrieb Dotan Cohen: > > > > When viewing events in Korganizer, how can the user know to > > > > which calendar the event belongs? > > > > In KDE 3.5 one can assign different colors to different calendars. > > > > > > Furthermore, when creating a new event, > > > > how can the user add it to a specific calendar? > > > > In KDE 3.5, after creating a new event, one was asked to which > > calendar the event should be added. > > > > > I am not sure, but I think that the newly added data is not being > > > written to the calendar files, but akonadi saves it "somewhere > > > else". So you are probably in danger of losing your data. > > > > KOrganizer is not yet using Akonadi (in KDE 4.2). In a beta version > > of KDE 4.2 the calendar resources were automatically converted to > > Akonadi bridge resources, but this was reverted in the final > > version of KDE 4.2 because there were some problems that could not > > be fixed for the release. > > > > > At least this was the case here: For some time, the option of > > > adding new data to a specific calendar had vanished (it normally > > > popped up after having defined a new event and then pressed OK). > > > Then, for some reason, I reloaded the calendar files into > > > Korganizer, and all the new data was gone. However, the option of > > > adding it to a specific calendar was back. > > > > Did you use a beta of KDE 4.2? If yes, then this might explain your > > observations. > > Yes, I did. Thanks for clarifying. > > > > I don't know how to tell akonadi to write all newly added data > > > into your calendar files. You might be in danger of losing it, as > > > it was the case here. Someone else might be able to tell you. > > > > If one's local calendars were converted to Akonadi bridge resources > > then one can revert this by removing the calendars from KOrganizer > > and then re-adding them as normal "Calendar in local file". > > Ok... What I did, though, is reloading the my existing calendar files > (which had not been updated by korganizer). So what you suggest is > creating a new calendar file by chosing the option "calendar in local > file", which then is filled with all the data that is presently in > korganizer. I suggest to remove the old calendar from KOrganizer. This will _not_ delete the calendar file. (Nevertheless you should make a backup of the calendar file before removing the old calendar.) Afterwards, add a new calendar of type "Calendar in local file" to KOrganizer and point it to the old calendar file. > So if I understand you correctly, then it's not "re-adding" the data > but creating a new calendar file based on the present data. Not quite. See above. > So how > does Korganizer recognize whether some event originally belonged to > calendar #1 and some other to calendar #2. Anway, right now I don't > need to find out. Sorry, but I don't understand the question. The number and the contents of the calendars will not change. Regards, Ingo _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkoQKfIACgkQGnR+RTDgudiOQgCfd4/XV5y2fZYQtp6ZlErKi88L Y7sAn32lNE4i6fHW3iCMfVCG1a/hKozS =hthk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----