Re: kmailrc > 35MB

On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009 21:44:27 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 20 May 2009 21:01:40 Frank Thieme wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 20 May 2009 17:39:15 Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > > You filed that report 2 weeks ago, and filed the solution
> > > > > today. Nobody cares? You mean they didn't drop whatever they
> > > > > were doing and jump?  Be reasonable. 2 weeks is not very
> > > > > long.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, but as it is not a cosmetical issue or a minor bug I
> > > > would have suspected any feedback/questions or something. Its
> > > > still there, waiting to be at least confirmed.
> > > >
> > > > Thats why I said nobody cared.
> >
> > Such a statement never helps. The developers do care.
> >
> > > > And it is very long, when I count the number of crashes since I
> > > > filed the bug... ;)
> > >
> > > You have to remember that if it has not been reported by anyone
> > > else it can't be a confirmed bug.  I wonder if the method for
> > > renaming has any bearing on this.  Can you explain *exactly* what
> > > you did to rename the folder?
> > >
> > > I also felt confused by the original message.  You said that
> > > kmailrc was 35MB, and if I understood it correctly the problem
> > > was one large line relating to a folder renamed.  Did you try
> > > backing up kmailrc and editing that line out?
> > >
> > > It's difficult for the very small dev team to tackle a problem
> > > unless you can give them lots of specifics.  If we can, on this
> > > list, get it a bit more tied down you can add to the bug report
> > > and may get more response, though you will have to accept that
> > > very little dev time is being spent on kde-pim in its current
> > > form, as they try to get the new one ready for release.
> >
> > Frank has made a suggestion how to solve the problem in his bug
> > report. I don't think there's more needed from his side.
>
> Where does this UIDStatusChangedLocally statement come from, Ingo?  I
> tried renaming an imap folder from this netbook, but didn't find the
> line either on the netbook nor on the server.  Is it something
> specific to dimap?

Yes. With online IMAP all status changes are pushed instantaneously to 
the server. With disconnected IMAP they are pushed to the server during 
the next synchronization. Until the next synchronization happens KMail 
keeps book of the messages which changed status.


Regards,
Ingo

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkoUc2wACgkQGnR+RTDgudhm9wCgspIfOMCf3Uqk3zFw/422uwJy
SpEAn2YT9Tn9xZ1p4rj0mvzStBCmGmGq
=RzQr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----