Re: KMail becomes slow after search
"O. Sinclair" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
O. Sinclair wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: >> On Monday 17 August 2009 10:43:29 O. Sinclair wrote: >>> Leander Sukov wrote: >>>> After searching for mails, KMail (at least my) becomes very slow. I >>>> want to debug the problem, but I do not know how I can do that. >>>> After deleting the last search in /home/~/.kde/share/apps/kmail KMail >>>> starts working in the usual way again. >>>> Does anyone else have an expierience like that? >>> Which version are you using? I am on KDE 3.5.10 w KMail 1.9.10 and have >>> experienced this so many times that I have almost stopped using the >>> Search function. Same goes for if I mark too many emails as Important. >>> Specially on startup KMail gets extremely slow and generates enormous >>> amounts of disk activity. >>> >> I have huge numbers of messages gathered over years, marked Important, and >> have never seen any ill-effect. OTOH, it has often been remarked that a >> search that creates a large search folder does have this effect. I don't know >> why it does, but when I get that result I always try to do a search that will >> produce few matches before I close the application. >> > > Well I have no idea how this might happen and just to test I marked a > few emails as Important and, touch wood, so far no problems. Maybe > something has changed since I last used the function. > > So it leaves us with the Search-related slowness. Again, I have avoided > creating Search-folders for a long time due to being massively irritated > when Kontact/KMail starts and the computer grinds to near halt. > Well I just made some searches and played around quite a bit and can not reproduce the problem any longer... I have not a clue as to when I last had it as I found it so irritating I stopped using these functions a while ago. I can only remember one thing I have done: I have uninstalled all modules related to Strigi as I found it unusable and pointless. Sinclair