Re: Date Conundrum
James Kerr <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 03 December 2009 Anne Wilson wrote: > On Wednesday 02 December 2009 22:20:27 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 December 2009, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > Can anyone explain to me why a message with these headers > > > > [snip] > > > > > Date: Wed,2 (null) 2009 18:28:55 -0000 (GMT Daylight Time) > > > > [snip] > > > > > should display as in the attached? > > > > Well, "Wed,2 (null) 2009" is not a valid date. > > Thanks both of you. I can't believe that I scanned the headers so > many times and missed that. I doubt if it will make any > difference, but I will comment on the problem to the sender - or > is it the sender, that's causing it? because this is not the only > date problem I have. > > I get security alerts from my Netgear router, and they displayed as > expected until 1st July (IIRC) when they suddenly started showing > the date as one month ahead. I ignored it, really, up to now, but > of course from this week, one month ahead puts me into next year. > To my surprise, though, they started showing the 010170 date. On > examination, is see the same problem as in the previous post: > > Date: Thu,3 (null) 2009 01:00:00 -0000 (GMT Daylight Time) > > whereas the last day of November, it showed > > Date: Mon,30 Dec 2009 20:56:19 -0000 (GMT Daylight Time) > > The first message in this thread was about an external message, > passing through the Netgear router and my imap server. The other > two were initiated by the router, passing through the imap server > only. The router config files show the correct date. The imap > server handles all other mail that displays correctly. It looks, > then, as though it is a firmware problem on the router. Yet if > that is so, why is external mail, from one company only, affected? > > I've been puzzling over this for months, so I'd really be glad of > any insight. > I had a Netgear router which behaved like that. IIRC from about September each year (it may have been earlier), until the end of the year, it would add a month to the date on emails that it originated. In January it would revert to using the correct month. There may be a firmware update available to rectify that. I don't recall seeing any similar anomaly in emails that were not originated by the router. Jim