Re: Why is KMail so memory-hungry?

Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Friday 18 December 2009, bill purvis wrote:
> I've been using KMail for a few years now, and recently upgraded my
> OS (Ubuntu) to 9.10. Everything seems to have expanded and in
> particular KMail! My poor laptop is only 512MB of real memory and is
> spending most of its time thrashing stuff to swap-space. Does KMail
> load the whole of my admittedly large collection of old emails into
> memory?

No, but it does load a small amount of data for each and every message 
in your mail store. This can sum up to a larger amount of memory. I 
don't know how the KDE 3 version compares to the KDE 4 version in this 
respect.

Also KMail doesn't handle messages with large attachments very 
efficiently.


> I've just spent the whole morning trying to respond to a few emails.
> I get long delays - 5 minutes is not unusual just moving a message
> from my inbox into another folder. I've just spent the past hour
> pursuading KMail to send someone an email - four times it crashed out
> saying that the smtp process had unexpectedly died. retrieve the
> message from the outbox, null edit, then send again. Eventually it
> has managed to send it.
>
> I do run a 'busy' machine with Firefox, Open Office, Apache, Mysql
> all running together, but they're all part of my normal work and it
> all worked fine under Ubuntu 8.04.
>
> I have been using 'top' to see what is going on, and see that KMail
> uses far more real memory than anything else - typical RSS=180m
> while other 'large' users are taking around 20m.
>
> I know that the solution is going to be - 'add more memory' but
> I feel that is a cop-out.

Alternatively, you could consider going back to Ubuntu 8.04.


> I'm getting a new laptop for Christmas and 
> that will get around the current state, but if things carry on
> expanding we'll all have to upgrade the hardware more often!
>
> Sorry if this just appears to be a long grumble, but I would
> appreciate some positive feedback on why KMail should be so
> demanding.

We hope that the situation will become much better once KMail has been 
ported to the new backend Akonadi.


Regards,
Ingo

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAksr15IACgkQGnR+RTDgudj8HgCgr+fbT+sZPjhMrEJqtIcWjUM5
VBEAoLNwXQpiWRAdHEUj+j/H5S0C0Ofw
=i6OT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.