Re: Why is KMail so memory-hungry?
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 18 December 2009, bill purvis wrote: > I've been using KMail for a few years now, and recently upgraded my > OS (Ubuntu) to 9.10. Everything seems to have expanded and in > particular KMail! My poor laptop is only 512MB of real memory and is > spending most of its time thrashing stuff to swap-space. Does KMail > load the whole of my admittedly large collection of old emails into > memory? No, but it does load a small amount of data for each and every message in your mail store. This can sum up to a larger amount of memory. I don't know how the KDE 3 version compares to the KDE 4 version in this respect. Also KMail doesn't handle messages with large attachments very efficiently. > I've just spent the whole morning trying to respond to a few emails. > I get long delays - 5 minutes is not unusual just moving a message > from my inbox into another folder. I've just spent the past hour > pursuading KMail to send someone an email - four times it crashed out > saying that the smtp process had unexpectedly died. retrieve the > message from the outbox, null edit, then send again. Eventually it > has managed to send it. > > I do run a 'busy' machine with Firefox, Open Office, Apache, Mysql > all running together, but they're all part of my normal work and it > all worked fine under Ubuntu 8.04. > > I have been using 'top' to see what is going on, and see that KMail > uses far more real memory than anything else - typical RSS=180m > while other 'large' users are taking around 20m. > > I know that the solution is going to be - 'add more memory' but > I feel that is a cop-out. Alternatively, you could consider going back to Ubuntu 8.04. > I'm getting a new laptop for Christmas and > that will get around the current state, but if things carry on > expanding we'll all have to upgrade the hardware more often! > > Sorry if this just appears to be a long grumble, but I would > appreciate some positive feedback on why KMail should be so > demanding. We hope that the situation will become much better once KMail has been ported to the new backend Akonadi. Regards, Ingo _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAksr15IACgkQGnR+RTDgudj8HgCgr+fbT+sZPjhMrEJqtIcWjUM5 VBEAoLNwXQpiWRAdHEUj+j/H5S0C0Ofw =i6OT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----