Re: IMAP
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 07 January 2010, Kārlis Repsons wrote: > On Thursday 03 December 2009 09:46:24 Kārlis Repsons wrote: > > Hi all, > > not knowing much about IMAP, I'm still going to set up Dovecot that > > way -- what I wanted to know is about search: how can dovecot's > > indexing feature be taken advantage of, when a search is performed > > with kmail? "Automatically"? Well, just to make sure it actually > > can work out... > > And now I'm back with some other, more concrete questions, but first > I'll tell briefly what has been done. > > I decided to sort mails per year/month and then set up an automatic > mechanism to sort within a month folder as desired. First I had to > migrate a chunk of old mails to those perhaps over 1k directories. > Note, that I set dovecot to > > :LAYOUT=fs, so I can use that mail tree with mutt in an emergency > : situation > > (which caused that all folders had to be created by hand on server, > failure with kmail). But I've not finished the migration yet, because > kmail is deadly slow. It takes some hours for it to process those > folders every time kmail is started and it "burns" a cpu core. > > Is that nonstandard serverside mails tree format to blame? Or with > maildir++ it'd be about just as slow? Probably yes. To KMail the folder tree wouldn't look different. The difference is only known by dovecot. As such it cannot affect KMail. > I read, some other IMAP module/whatever is going to be ready for > KMail, but is there sufficient reason to think, it will handle such > large imap mailbox trees, which are in addition filesystem trees, not > maildir++? Akonadi will hopefully cope better with this. Does the situation improve if you "hide" all but about 100 folders from dovecot (and thus also from KMail)? Regards, Ingo _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAktGX70ACgkQGnR+RTDgudj8oQCgzUESAk+qLjH8+5k/E3WQO0wi Pg0AoKlcW1ONpiVUdXz3niUQIycwfO0+ =SmX9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----