Re: kmail + akonadi + nepomuk = check mail takes forever :/
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 04 March 2010, Darknight wrote: > 2010-03-03 21:45:00 Ingo Klöcker > > > You might want to disable the Strigi Desktop File Indexer. It is > > not needed for KMail (or any of the other KDE PIM apps). I think > > the file indexer is mostly responsible for the size of Nepomuk's > > database. > > I double checked but it was already disabled as I don't use it. > However disabling "nepomuk semantic desktop" in the same dialog, > killing processes and restarting kmail apparently did the trick. > I had not tried because I thought it would prevent akonadi from > starting but obviously this was not the case. I feel a bit confused > about what is really needed to run kmail now and what will be in the > future. I don't think I want nepomuk around if I get the kind of hit > I experienced but I've read at least a blog entry that says nepomuk > will be one of the premiums of the new kmail. (?) Without Nepomuk things like distribution lists will not work. Also finding messages will probably not work without Nepomuk. Basically everything that is related to searching will not work. Regards, Ingo _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkuQOr0ACgkQGnR+RTDgudgrYQCeN+vEBrYZdomhTybL5+UDnYpi cqYAnRRSnx8xYPZj0eqI/iPuIQ0csffS =mW02 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----