Re: The future of KAddressBook

Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sunday 07 March 2010, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> On Monday 01 March 2010, Anne Wilson elucidated thus:
> > For those of you concerned about the apparent loss of view of some
> > fields, and any other aspect regarding the status of KAddressBook,
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222678 should answer many of
> > your questions.
> 
> Thanks for posting this. Yet more reasons for me to stick with KDE
> 3.5.11 on Kubuntu 9.10 for now.  See http://apt.pearsoncomputing.net/
> for more information.

You could as well go for KDE SC 4.3. OTOH, if KDE SC 3.5 serves you well 
then there's no reason to switch. I have used 3.5 until about 2 months 
ago. Now I'm using 4.4. So far I haven't found anything in KDE SC 4 
which made the switch worthwhile for me, but since for me everything 
works as good as in 4.4 as it used to work in 3.5 I will stay with 4.4. 
Of course, everybody else's mileage will vary.

I encourage everybody to stay with the version they are currently using 
unless there are extremely compelling reasons that make a switch 
necessary. Never change a running system!


Regards,
Ingo

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkuTmxMACgkQGnR+RTDgudieEwCguNtrqhRRzTzrFWUc9sdrrsHQ
euwAn0cqSJ7VlMMwZ81T52XAlkmeI9vz
=wuvL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.