Re: unconfirmed bugs
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 22 March 2010, Dj YB wrote: > hello, > > there are some bugs I have reported and most of them are still > unconfirmed, does it mean that no one else have that problem? > how a bug becomes confirmed? If it is confirmed by a bug triager or somebody else with the necessary permissions. The bugs might also be auto-confirmed if the number of votes reaches a certain number, but I'm not sure whether this feature is enabled. > does it matter what the status is? I don't know. When I still fixed bugs it didn't matter. > the bugs are: > > 26/10/2009 > moving all recurring event to different day of week not working > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211972 > > 19/10/2009 > month view event paste bug > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211125 > > 02/03/2010 > open in addressbook, not presented > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=229085 > > if no one can reproduce those bugs then what should I do? Not sure. If you can still reproduce them with the latest stable version then add another comment. Ohh, I see you already did this. That's very good. Most bug reporters never report whether their bugs still occur in later version. You might also want to ask on forums or whereever whether others can reproduce those bugs. Maybe some readers of this list will confirm the bugs (in the sense that they add a comment to those bug reports). Regards, Ingo _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkuny90ACgkQGnR+RTDgudgURwCgkZmPXk7XNuA+4+xYTGdM8OPw XlcAoKX8YeZrtRwd8pDL9OpD0jPsI31K =Gpm5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----