Re: ONLY start KMail?
"O. Sinclair" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John Aldrich wrote: > On Thu May 13 2010, Ingo Klöcker wrote: >>> My only question is "if these things aren't even being used, why are >>> they running in the first place?" Is it a *requirement* that all >>> this crap run in the background? Why do you require all this junk >>> just to get email? Am I going to have to sacrifice the functionality >>> and experience and get a new email client? >> Crap? Junk? If you think this is crap and junk then, yes, please get >> another email client. We don't need users who think that what we do is >> crap and junk. >> >> > To me, anything NOT specifically required for sending/receiving/reading > email is crap. That means, that calendaring, etc is junk to me as it is not > directly related to sending/receiving/reading email. Why can we not have a > "KMail-Lite" as well as a full-featured "Outlook Replacement." To go with a > Microsoft-centric example, not everyone wants Outlook. Some folks are quite > happy with Outlook Express. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles that > Outlook does, but it does email just fine. It also does newsgroups, but I > don't know of anyone who ever used that feature. :-) > > I use Outlook at work for my email so I can have access to the additional > features such as calendaring, meeting requests, etc. At home, I just want > email and I *like* the KMail interface. What I don't like is all the > additional stuff that KMail includes. > > As far as export goes, is there any way to export all your contacts at once > instead of having to export them one at a time? > _______________________________________________ As for your comments I think plenty have already pointed out that you can run KMail separate, I do sometimes when I feel like it. You are trying to discuss whether the linking to KDE4 technologies is a bad or good thing basically. That discussion is sort of over, whether we like it or not. and as for Outlook and import.. shudder. There is a way of importing mbox files in Outlook but it is, put mildly, troublesome and not worth the effort unless you REALLY need to