Re: ONLY start KMail?

"O. Sinclair" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <[email protected]>
John Aldrich wrote:
> On Thu May 13 2010, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>>> My only question is "if these things aren't even being used, why are
>>> they running in the first place?" Is it a *requirement* that all
>>> this crap run in the background? Why do you require all this junk
>>> just to get email? Am I going to have to sacrifice the functionality
>>> and experience and get a new email client?
>> Crap? Junk? If you think this is crap and junk then, yes, please get
>> another email client. We don't need users who think that what we do is
>> crap and junk.
>>
>>
> To me, anything NOT specifically required for sending/receiving/reading 
> email is crap. That means, that calendaring, etc is junk to me as it is not 
> directly related to sending/receiving/reading email. Why can we not have a 
> "KMail-Lite" as well as a full-featured "Outlook Replacement." To go with a 
> Microsoft-centric example, not everyone wants Outlook. Some folks are quite 
> happy with Outlook Express. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles that 
> Outlook does, but it does email just fine. It also does newsgroups, but I 
> don't  know of anyone who ever used that feature. :-)
> 
> I use Outlook at work for my email so I can have access to the additional 
> features such as calendaring, meeting requests, etc. At home, I just want 
> email and I *like* the KMail interface. What I don't like is all the 
> additional stuff that KMail includes.
> 
> As far as export goes, is there any way to export all your contacts at once 
> instead of having to export them one  at a time?
> _______________________________________________
As for your comments I  think plenty have already pointed out that you
can run KMail separate, I do sometimes when I feel like it. You are
trying to discuss whether the linking to KDE4 technologies is a bad or
good thing basically. That discussion is sort of over, whether we like
it or not.

and as for Outlook and import.. shudder. There is a way of importing
mbox files in Outlook but it is, put mildly, troublesome and not worth
the effort unless you REALLY need to
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.