Re: Signing/encryption again again...

On Thursday 17 June 2010 08:37:02 Thomas Olsen wrote:
> On Thursday 17 June 2010 06:52:59 Thomas Olsen wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 June 2010 00:37:19 Thomas Olsen wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > I must have some mental lapse with this because I'm really having a
> > > hard time getting it to work.
> > > Well on the good side: I (maybe) finally got signing/encrypting using
> > > my S/MIME X.509 certificate - Yeah :-)
> > > 
> > > Sorry for the long mail but I would really like for this to work.
> > 
> > Hmm. Now when kgpg scans the keyring it says:
> > 
> > tru::1:1276722166:1434401996:3:1:5
> > pub:r:1024:17:6666717ADB835679:1gpg: mpi too large for this
> > implementation (60453 bits)
> > gpg: keyring_get_keyblock: read error: invalid packet
> > gpg: keydb_get_keyblock failed: invalid keyring
> > 043404732:::-:::sca:
> > 
> > and my key doesn't show up in the list.
> 
> Never mind. Fixed it by exporting my public key, renaming pubring.gpg and
> importing the key again. Apparently there was an invalid key in my keyring.
> This is getting to be a long thread of me talking to myself :-D

And it also solved the problem of not being able to use the key for encryption 
but I still wonder why other signed messages shows up as "The signature is 
valid, but the key's validity is unknown".

-- 
Best Regards / Med venlig hilsen

Thomas Olsen

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iF0EABEIAAYFAkwZxTwACgkQge+YkdGJAWipEgD+LlbI5fbaeG/rpT78iL4OeEBv
2lgEJNUYQbFmV5Cyk4UA+MiPtFpk5mxDNuKnDTW9Z7fAWNprekvRv3pa4qI4YDc=
=DdGk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----