Re: Moving message to folder when mail is opened

On Monday 12 July 2010, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 11. Juli 2010 23:54:25 schrieb Ingo Klöcker:
> > On Sunday 11 July 2010, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, 11. Juli 2010 17:33:30 schrieb Ingo Klöcker:
> > > > Pascal, please do not include your public PGP key in all of
> > > > your messages. Anybody interested in your key can easily fetch
> > > > it from a keyserver. It suffices if you include the
> > > > fingerprint of your key in the footer of your messages.
> > > > 
> > > > On Sunday 11 July 2010, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> > > > > Am Sonntag, 11. Juli 2010 14:02:59 schrieb Anne Wilson:
> > > > > > On Sunday 11 July 2010 12:42:32 Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> > > > > > > Sorry Ingo,
> > > > > > > I didn't to insult anybody. It's just that all programs
> > > > > > > seem to have things I don't like. That's why I use two
> > > > > > > different mail applications (Outlook is not an option
> > > > > > > with Linux and above all too slow and has too many
> > > > > > > features I don't use and see no sense in using), each
> > > > > > > with its advantages and its drawbacks. In general I find
> > > > > > > most software somewhat dissatisfying, but as I'm not a
> > > > > > > developer, I cannot improve or customize it, only
> > > > > > > complain about it, which is easier anyway! :-). Well, it
> > > > > > > seems that different people have different expectations
> > > > > > > about what a specific program is supposed to do.
> > > > > > > Apparently I have a weird taste that is not commonly
> > > > > > > shared. I didn't mean that developers do not care about
> > > > > > > users, but that both groups do not want the same
> > > > > > > features as I do. Looking forward to Kmail2, whenever it
> > > > > > > will be released. Is there some sort of informal release
> > > > > > > schedule? I know that things always take longer than
> > > > > > > originally planned, just to have an idea.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The reason many of us choose KMail is its sheer
> > > > > > configurability. Of course you have to invest a little time
> > > > > > in setting it up as you want it to be, but then that's
> > > > > > true of anything useful.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Anne
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi Anne,
> > > > > 
> > > > > you are right that Kmail is more configurable than other mail
> > > > > programs. In Evolution you can not even customize the
> > > > > toolbar. But as you mention configurability: when I open an
> > > > > HTML-message the font are forbiddingly small (2-3 pt) as I
> > > > > have a 1900x1280 resolution.
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm. This should not happen unless the font in the HTML
> > > > messages is explicitly set to such a small size. As KMail uses
> > > > Konqueror HTML rendering engine (khtml) the following might
> > > > help:
> > > > - Start Konqueror
> > > > - Open Konqueror's configuration dialog, select "Web
> > > > Browsing/Appearance"
> > > > - On the Fonts tab set minimum font size and medium font size.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, it did not work. I guess it has to do with the
> > > resolution.
> > 
> > I have a similar resolution (1920x1200 with 100 dpi). If the font
> > size in the HTML messages is specified in absolute (resolution
> > dependent) pixel size instead of in (resolution independent) point
> > size then fonts will look smaller on displays with a higher
> > resolution (i.e. with a higher dpi value). I had a brief look at
> > the source code of two newsletters and indeed in both newsletter
> > the font sizes where specified in px.
> 
> Thanks for your effort and the information. But quite frankly, I
> don't really know what to make of it. Do I understand you right,
> that the way these HTML- messages are "written" with the font sizes
> specified in px, they will be displayed with small font sizes
> according to our resolutions?

Yes, you understood correctly.


> And there is not much one can do about
> it (if one does not like it that way)?

Not much, I guess, except for specifying the minimal font size that 
KMail shall use (which does not seem to be controllable via Konqueror 
:-( ). The problem is that if the HTML message says that the text shall 
be displayed with a font size of 10 pixels then on my screen this text 
will be about 1/10 th of an inch high, i.e. about 2.5 mm. On displays 
with even higher resolution the text will be even smaller.


> As zooming-in is quite easy
> in Kmail that is not much of an issue, I was just wondering if I
> could change the font size per default.

You can change the default font size. But if the HTML message explicitly 
requests a certain font size then KMail will use this font size instead 
of the default font size.


Regards,
Ingo

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkw7hKwACgkQGnR+RTDgudjNhgCdFuLk68mF3KJL7TMzQoMsqra5
40QAnjl4zQSpAQuwAdvocqUefQ9QZqZs
=lnS7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----