Re: KMail - Replying in HTML

On Sunday 08 August 2010 14:40:48 Johannes Fichtinger wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 8.
August 2010 schrieb Bob Smits:
> > No thanks. That would put Kmail in the
ranks of other programs who don't
> > care about spewing their junk into
everyone's email. As it is, if we
> > choose to accept html mail from
someone at our discretion, we still don't
> > accidentally pass on the crap
to others.
> 
> Sorry, but this is really not a clever argument. If you
accidentally do
> something wrong, then you can improve and do it correct
the next time (ie.
> setting the opion to reply in plain text only).
> 
> So
if I compare opportunities und threats of proper html support, there is
>
almost no disadvantage for the single user but many advantages specially
>
for corporate users.
> 
> And btw, it is not the “programs who don't care
about spewing their junk
> into everyone's email”, but it is still only the
user, who is responsible.
> So, please don‘t argue for artificially limiting
the power of some tools
> because of the stupidity of others. This is done
in the commercial world
> anyhow far too much.
> 
I really do not understand
this.  KMail users in general do not want this.  Other applications exist
that give you it.  Why do you insist on trying to force it on us?

Anne
--

KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from
http://userbase.kde.org

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkxe17YACgkQj93fyh4cnBeJwwCfQEay5h56U4jQhBkmOurAxhoZ
srIAn0bXuqpa5j1ZeOzJBLW5hEWReB2f
=pltd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----