Re: No interest was Re: KMail - Replying in HTML
John Murphy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:23:59 am Pastor JW wrote: > > The `trial balloon' didn't get off the ground. :) There doesn't seem > > to be sufficient interest to fund `KMail - Repling in HTML' > > > > Aside from the handful of people who posted here, I heard nothing on > > `opensuse-kde' I suppose I can update the previous enhancement with > > the request for pledges but at this point, I'll call it dead. > > I suspect you'll get much more support in this position! Most people are not > to fond of their tools being ruined by misuse, ...yes, it IS possible to pry a > door open with a screwdriver but the screwdriver was designed to turn screws > rather than what a prybar was designed to do. It is just the right tool for > the job concept of a craftsman that one appreciates. Regrettable - and an example of what I was said originally (with a little editing for sensitivities): "Great shame. Marks KMail as an elitist, only-techies-welcome client. Why this groupthink "HTML is evil" is still around is a mystery. I did think opensource was about choice - but not in some areas it seems. Still, I suppose we should be thankful we have basic HTML - and spell-checkers." And no, I am not demanding anything - just making a comment. And no, I don't use HTML mail at all (well probably about as much as those that claim they delete important stuff unread). I just think the facility should be there for those that don't have a choice. Like many others (who don't post at all) - when we spot an email client that is not so restricted, and is at least as elegant and integrated into its environment as KMail, we will move on: exercising choice - as I've been advised to do by many on this list. We have moved on before, and we will move on again. That's not a aggressive statement, it's a fact of software life. And many thanks to Pablo, Richard and others for looking for solutions to making KMail (and by extension KDE) more appealing to a wider community. Unfortunately it seems - good product, wrong mindset - not an unusual combination. Regards, johnM