Re: akonadi on low-end systems
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 01 December 2010, Николай Шафоростов wrote: > Hi all. I'm a netbook user, and I'm worrying about KDE becoming > resource-hungry: > > I run kubuntu 10.10 with KDE 4.5 (plasma-netbook) on acer with a > harddrive and 1 gb ram, and see that mysqld-akonadi and akonadi_* > processes are always running and are taking at least 40 megs of RAM > constantly. e.g. virt:218m res:26m shr:2 mysqld-akonadi (via top) > > i don't use any of kdepim apps, and can get along without holiday > marks in calendar i see after clickng on the clock in the panel (if > that's akonadi-related). > > I also have another netbook with a 8gb solid-state drive and 512 mb > ram which runs debian with KDE 4.4 and I'm afraid to think how it > would perform if i updated to a newer KDE there. > > > are there any plans or statements regarding making a base KDE system > able to run without akonadi, making it possible to avoid installing > akonadi for those who want a light KDE version? This depends very much on what you understand under a "base KDE system". If this "base KDE system" includes any applications that handle data like addresses, calendars, email or communication in general then you are probably out of luck. Also I will not tire of pointing out that a special Akonadi based version of Kontact runs well on smart phones which are less powerful than your netbook. So your concerns about Akonadi are largely unfounded. Regards, Ingo _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkz20uYACgkQGnR+RTDgudh1lgCgxPWPrUqASTcZCr+ZjElYTlM1 YAcAoJQvWtDRdEtZepLWtkcu/uLvpxVc =TNQg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----