Re: Akonadi + nfs home directories

On Sunday 03 April 2011, Martin (KDE) wrote:
> Am Samstag, 2. April 2011 schrieb Ingo Klöcker:
> > On Friday 01 April 2011, Lars Behrens wrote:
> > > Am 31.03.2011 23:33, schrieb Ingo Klöcker:
> > > > Your assumption about our assumption is wrong. For us
> > > > enterprise means IMAP, LDAP and/or a PIM server (Kolab,
> > > > Exchange, etc.). IOW, nothing (except for cached data) is
> > > > local.
> > > 
> > > Network file systems are not on that list...
> > 
> > True. But I was talking about PIM data only. Storing PIM data on
> > NAS instead of on dedicated servers like IMAP servers, LDAP
> > servers or generic PIM servers is in my book not enterprise. Of
> > course, for non-PIM data the usage of NAS is enterprise.
> 
> In general I would second that but it is common practise in many
> companies to restrict mailboxes to 50MByte of space (or something
> similar). So you have to store your pim data somewhere else.

Yes, I know this practise. It stems from the days when storage was 
expensive. Nowadays this practise (or at least such insanely small 
limits) are just wrong. The size of hard disks doubles each year (or 
maybe every 1.5 years; the exact progression doesn't matter) and the 
ratio storage space/money constantly decreases. Still the quota for mail 
boxes stays constant for ages. This makes no sense. Also, any cheap 
freemail provider out there offers at least 1 GB of space.

I suggest you talk to your IT department if you are hampered by an 
unrealistically small quota.

If you scrub your messages from huge attachments (which you can safely 
store on a NAS) then a quota of 1 GB will easily suffice for decades.


Regards,
Ingo

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk2YQ74ACgkQGnR+RTDgudhHuQCZAV5AnsXF3Pu0dIOdBysvYpYU
tdIAnRRl6v4dTdAMgTC15eA7oo3+C5Ga
=BZWC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----