Re: With IMAP_IDLE in kmail2 is interval checking redundant?

Kevin Krammer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday, 2011-06-13, Kishore wrote:
> On Monday 13 Jun 2011 2:05:59 PM Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > On Monday, 2011-06-13, Kishore wrote:
> > > The subject pretty much sums up my question.
> > > 
> > > I have a few IMAP accounts with google and i have them configured to
> > > check every 5 mins. This as i understand was necessary in kmail 1 as
> > > the IMAP_IDLE was not there.
> > > 
> > > In kmail 2 with IMAP_IDLE implemented, is it still necessary to set
> > > interval checking?
> > 
> > Depends on the server.
> > IDLE is an IMAP extension and might not be supported by the server.
> > As far as I know it also required one connection per monitored mail
> > folder.
> 
> GMail being a very commonly used service, would you know if this would work
> for GMail?

No idea, sorry. I heard that GMail is quite bad when it comes to correctly 
advertising its capabilities (quite obviously they would prefer people to use 
their web frontend).

> Also, is "push mail" the same thing?

Yes.

> As apparently with gmail (and an
> android client) notifications only arrive on the inbox.

Ah, then this shouldn't be a problem.

Cheers,
Kevin
-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 190 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBN9kCSnKMhG6pzZJIRAgMCAJ40nVE4Hz8WF0J00N4QNmJBh8Vf/QCdEBzb
3nVHgbWVQBEFem7Ymy49q3Q=
=qghT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.