Re: With IMAP_IDLE in kmail2 is interval checking redundant?
Kevin Krammer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday, 2011-06-13, Kishore wrote: > On Monday 13 Jun 2011 2:05:59 PM Kevin Krammer wrote: > > On Monday, 2011-06-13, Kishore wrote: > > > The subject pretty much sums up my question. > > > > > > I have a few IMAP accounts with google and i have them configured to > > > check every 5 mins. This as i understand was necessary in kmail 1 as > > > the IMAP_IDLE was not there. > > > > > > In kmail 2 with IMAP_IDLE implemented, is it still necessary to set > > > interval checking? > > > > Depends on the server. > > IDLE is an IMAP extension and might not be supported by the server. > > As far as I know it also required one connection per monitored mail > > folder. > > GMail being a very commonly used service, would you know if this would work > for GMail? No idea, sorry. I heard that GMail is quite bad when it comes to correctly advertising its capabilities (quite obviously they would prefer people to use their web frontend). > Also, is "push mail" the same thing? Yes. > As apparently with gmail (and an > android client) notifications only arrive on the inbox. Ah, then this shouldn't be a problem. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 190 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBN9kCSnKMhG6pzZJIRAgMCAJ40nVE4Hz8WF0J00N4QNmJBh8Vf/QCdEBzb 3nVHgbWVQBEFem7Ymy49q3Q= =qghT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----