Re: SOLVED: Re: I rarely complain about Akonadi
Thomas Tanghus Olsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <18722456.3gnqQkK4hl@tanghus> |
On Saturday 28 January 2012 20:08 Thomas Tanghus Olsen wrote: > On Thursday 26 January 2012 22:37 Thomas Tanghus Olsen wrote: > > On Thursday 26 January 2012 22:28 Anders Lund wrote: > > > I'm sure of course that kaddressbook tries to do things right, but > > > somehow > > > things goes wrong either during storage or retrieval of the contact > > > tags/categories. > > > > > > For me, a good step would be to a check somewhere before displaying a > > > value, and some means for cleaning up those objects, simply to make > > > things bearable, even if it would be a temporary strategy while things > > > are improved. > > > > He, I was getting carried away ;-) But a simple check for empty/invalid > > values could improve the user experience a lot. > > I've been so busy bitching about mail filters, that I didn't even notice our > wish has been granted in 4.8: No empty message tags and no empty contact > categories! I spoke too soon. They're back - with a vengeance. -- Med venlig hilsen / Best Regards Thomas Tanghus Olsen _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users