Re: KDEPIM 4.8.1 showstopper - for me at least
"O. Sinclair" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 23/03/12 17:48, O. Sinclair wrote: > On 23/03/12 17:21, Kevin Krammer wrote: >> On Friday, 2012-03-23, O. Sinclair wrote: >>> On 23/03/12 12:21, Kevin Krammer wrote: >>>> On Friday, 2012-03-23, O. Sinclair wrote: >>>>> On 23/03/12 11:56, Mathias Homann wrote: >>>>>> Am Freitag, 23. März 2012, 11:25:26 schrieb O. Sinclair: >> >>>>>>> well well, on forums.kde.org a developer claims that this was >>>>>>> deliberately removed to "complete transfer to Akonadi" but is >>>>>>> back in >>>>>>> "trunk". But will not be back in main code until 4.9... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> which means 4.8.x is a no-go area for me at least >>>>>> >>>>>> link please, I would like to comment on that. >>>>> >>>>> http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=215&t=100742 >>>> >>>> So a user running a self built version thinks that a possible cause >>>> could >>>> have been a porting artifact. >>>> Not sure how this translates into "a developer claims this was >>>> deliberately removed". >>>> >>>> Interestingly one commentor on this thread wrote that it works for him. >>>> Maybe we should also translate this in a similar manner as "a developer >>>> claims this was deliberately implemented to quickly send emails to >>>> contacts" >>>> >>>> Subscription management: >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users >>> >>> more specifically he states he is "System Settings and Device Actions >>> KCM maintainer". >> >> Yes, he is. >> >>> Not quite mr. Average User but to me a developer. >> >> Being a developer doesn't mean you are not a just a user of a different >> software, even if it comes from the same vendor. >> Building that other software yourself might make you a more non >> average user, >> but then this would also be true for any non-developer building >> themselves, >> e.g. Gentoo users. >> >> A difference would have been if he had stated that he had checked the >> code and >> saw that said functionality was disabled, but he just stated an >> assumption. >> >> If I am tracking down a solution for another user's question by trying >> menu >> options or settings that sound related than this is very different >> than going >> into the code and searching there. >> And depending on the complexity of the code this might even be >> different from >> what a developer accustomed to the code can dig up. >> >> I wish being a developer would make me automatically all-knowing about >> any >> piece of software, alas it does not :-/ >> >>> Though perhaps not of KDEPIM but I struggle to remember when anyone but >>> Ingo Klöcker to active part on this list or other forums. >> >> I'd say from the last couple of days on this list at least also Andras >> and >> myself. >> Not any other KMail developer though as far as I can tell. >> Haven't checked the forum though. >> > > my apologies to you Kevin if you are indeed a KDEPIM developer, > something I had not noticed. Your signature states KDE Dev, but not > specifically what parts. > > Obviously being a dev of another piece of KDE does not make you a guru > of all the other bits and pieces but the comments he makes is the best > clue I have seen so far as to why this function is gone. > > I will go a mile extra next week (slow internet at home) and > download/install Kub Beta w 12.04 in a virtualbox machine, make a fresh > KMail user and see if it then works. If it still does not work I can > only consider it broken, at least in Kubuntu w KDE 4.8.1 and apparently > OpenSuse w KDE 4.8.x > OK, today I downloaded Kubuntu 12.04 Beta with KDE 4.8.0 and installed in Virtualbox and I can confirm that autocompletion of email addresses from addresbooks do not work in that environment, "fresh out of the box new user". I was going to try Chakra too but it seems to have issues with Virtualbox. _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users