Re: handling akonadi and nepomuk

Kevin Krammer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Organization KDE
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wednesday, 2012-08-08, Martin (KDE) wrote:

> It seems to be a problem with session management. If I don't stop
> nepomuk by hand before logout I have 6 entries of nepomukservicestub and
> one nepomukcontroller in my ksmserverrc file. I don't know if the
> controller has to be handled by session management but the stubs should
> not be started by session manager. Is this a bug? Can this be configured
> somewhere?

I am not sure how Nepomuk controller is usually started, but I would have 
expected that to be either through autostart or D-Bus activation.

In any case I agree that its helper processes should only be controlled by the 
controller and not participate in session managment [1].

Not sure whether it is a bug or just hasn't been considered. You could try 
asking on the Nepomuk developer list.

Cheers,
Kevin

[1] Akonadi agents for example explicitly disable the session management 
capabilties they inherit from the KDE application infrastructure, they are 
managed by Akonadi's controller.

-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 190 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBQIiIhnKMhG6pzZJIRAvOyAJ48GclCQlevaHAdOkGkMtbAhS5YDQCdGH/t
+jRRep7Kq0lY3gLwYVKLSSc=
=TU6Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.