Re: KMail2 at kdepim 4.9.0

Robert Smits <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On August 16, 2012 12:22:26 pm O. Sinclair wrote:


> I am assuming you mean what most call KDEPIM2 when you write KDEPIM4,
> that is the KDE4 version of KDEPIM.

Yes, that's right. 

> So I have protest - v4.9 that I am on now seems to have no problems with
> lists/groups and most certainly I have used the same basic address list
> (personal contacts) since KDE3.

Well, version 4.9 is NOT available in my OpenSuSe repos yet, and I understand 
it won't be available until OpenSuSe 12.3, so it's not a lot of use to me. I 
have not had great experiences installing newer versions than those supplied 
by my OS.

> Whether it is an improvement or not is up to each and every one - while
> I can find myself wishing for a "fork" of the old KDEPIM I can
> understand the problem of keeping it alive and updated.

What problem? KDE3 is alive and well, and is expected to be so for a long 
time.

> And I could add that also v 4.7.x worked quite well while I was most
> unhappy with 4.8.x - and choose not to upgrade. As in THAT version
> groups/lists have problems and functions such as autocomplete an address
> from your addressbook did not work.

Those are exactly the sort of reasons why I will keep trying newer versions of 
KDE4, but suspect I will prefer KDE3 versions of KDEPIM. I really like both 
OpenSuSe and KDE4 in general, which is why I'm sticking to them and will keep 
trying the new versions of KDEPIM, so I'm hopeful. 



-- 
Bob Smits <[email protected]> 
"Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO is the 
answer."   - Erik Naggum
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.