Re: Filter on language
Henk van Velden <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Organization | HenM |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Saturday 17 November 2012 19:48:32 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 15. November 2012 schrieb ianseeks: > > Hi > > Hi Ian, > > > I'm getting loads of spam from a japanese sites and i'm now bored of > > updating my junk filters every day . > > > > Is there a way i can filter out emails that are using asian language > > fonts? > > I am not aware of something like this. But the encoding might be in the > mail headers that you can view with the V key. You can filter for anything > in there. Maybe there is also something else. Hmmm, I scanned some of my > using foreign charsets spams that CRM114 has sorted my into spam folder > and they do not seem to have any helpful headers. > > Thus I can only imagine running it through an external program that > detects encoding, or a small script calling such a program and then > decides whether spam or not. > > Anyway, I recommend something more generic – at least if you are running > your own mail server: policyd-weight. It removes most spam at SMTP level > by some tests and asking a set of blacklists. > > On the client I suggest CRM114. I wrote an article on how to integrate, > but did not test this with KDEPIM 2 already. Tell me if you are interested > and I see if this article has been translated to english and possibly > provide a link. > > Whats the advantage of CRM114 or another self-learning spam filter? You do > not have to create your own spam filter rules every day. > > From the tons of spam to my mail address each day, I only see 0-10 in > unsure folder. There are more in the local spam folder, but I only scan > subject lines quickly to make sure CRM114 had no false positives, which it > didn´t recently. > > In fact, policyd-weight and CRM114 make it possible to actually read my > mail. Otherwise I would have to search it in a sea of spam first. > > CRM114 could be used client side, even stand alone. I use it client side, > but still with POP3. Heck, this works so fine and I only ever read my mail > on this laptop, that I might continue using POP3. > > Both need some time I get the concepts and set them up, but IMHO its > really worth it. I have no single hand crafted spam filter rule at all. So > I do not have to do anything except for give CRM114 a little training when > the next spam wave comes from somewhere else than Japan. Actually I hardly > ever notice any spam waves. CRM114 learns quickly, efficiently and also > forgets as needed. All with just two about 12 MiB sized mmap()ed files. > > And this setup works for years already. Without any major changes. > > With everybody and every provider doing this, there would probably not be > a market for spammers anymore. Thats the hope of some CRM114 developers. > > That said, there may be other spam filters being that efficient, like dspam > or newer spamassassin versions that I think the Zimbra at work uses. > CRM114 isn´t even only a spam filter, it can classify any texts. > > Ciao, As the only character encoding that is (going to be) used by modern systems is UTF-8 encoded Unicode, filtering on encoding (like the several ISO 8859 versions) is not going to work. @ianseeks: though I understand what you want, talking about Asian fonts will not help in understanding the problem. A font is only a small picture generated to make visable to a human being what a character code is. It is about the Unicode codes you get in the mail. As these are in groups (e.g. Japanese Hiragana is 3040 - 309F) a filter could decide that many characters within specific ranges in a mail could rate that mail as spam. But (as all spam filtering) it is no exact science. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Henk van Velden _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users