Re: Yet Another Troubled KMail2 Migration Successful (Maybe) (For Now)

On 06/07/2013 09:14, O. Sinclair wrote:
> On 06/07/2013 03:30, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 02:21:51 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>>> The whole thing smacks of  students wanting to play with new tech
>>>> instead
>>>> of the boring work of actually creating a working product. I have no
>>>> faith that it will ever be reliable.
>>>
>>> Thank you for the news. You confirm my intention to stick with
>>> Kmail-1 pro
>>> tem. Until Kmail-2 is usable, that is.
>>
>>
>> I'd say KMail2 is usable right now for me, with cavet that I don't use
>> the
>> mail filters.
>>
>> Its nepomuk - the search engine which is the big problem, but its a
>> completely
>> seperate product to kmail/akonadi. If you disable email indexing its ok
>> though.
>>
>> I'd say the kmail devs are recognising that now was well - address
>> completion,
>> which used to use nepomuk no longer does. As a result it actually works.
>>
>
> I just have to chip in against that - on 4.10.3 and on I have no
> problems with address completion or "groups" and I do use email indexing
> etc. Also for me Search kind of works but admittedly far from always
> accurate.
>
Search, at least in 4.10.4, is a bit strange like this: Search "subject" 
contains "any" and give value "internet" I get loads of hits.

Search on "from" contains "any" and give value "tibblin" I get null. 
Give value "*tibblin*" and I get loads of hits (someone I have a 
business relation with for some 8 years now).

I would expect the input string should be one or the other regardless of 
WHAT Search criteria you want to use
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users