Re: Snort "TCP session without 3-way handshake" warning
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Organization | at home |
| Message-ID | <4183378.etdTW34MVQ@wstn> |
On Thursday 10 Apr 2014 16:51:50 Paul Sobey wrote: > On Wednesday 09 Apr 2014 10:23:32 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I'm running KMail 4.11.5 on a Gentoo amd64 box. One of my accounts is a > > POP3 connection to my LAN server. I installed snort on the server > > yesterday, and now I get warnings like this in the snort alert log: > > > > [**] [129:20:1] TCP session without 3-way handshake [**] > > [Classification: Potentially Bad Traffic] [Priority: 2] > > 04/09-10:13:39.343914 192.168.0.6:49854 -> 192.168.0.2:22 > > TCP TTL:64 TOS:0x10 ID:37404 IpLen:20 DgmLen:104 DF > > ***AP*** Seq: 0xF037D897 Ack: 0x8F8FE3C5 Win: 0x152 TcpLen: 32 > > TCP Options (3) => NOP NOP TS: 249552861 325460764 > > > > The IPs are this box, 192.168.0.6, and the server, 192.168.0.2, which is > > running dovecot 2.2.9 to serve POP3 e-mails. > > > > Do I need to set something in KMail, or is this a bug - or is snort being > > too pernickety? I have nearly 5MB of logs from snort already. > > The fragment you cite above is to tcp/22 which is ssh, not pop3 (unless you > have things configured differently than the norm). So it is. KMail sets itself up to use STARTTLS for collecting mail from dovecot on the server; I assume that's the reason. > Without seeing more it's hard to be sure, but I wonder if your network card > is doing some sort of tcp offload such that snort doesn't see the entire > traffic stream? I've seen offload upset packet analysers a few times. Now you mention it, I have seen something about commanding the card not to be clever that way. I'll see if I can track it down. Thanks for the idea. -- Regards Peter _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users