Re: rant
Diederik de Haas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Organization | Connecting Knowledge |
| Message-ID | <1662952.Jgc0zmQBHh@bagend> |
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:12:20 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > I do not think that any "but the concept is all bad" is > going to help. > > I think the main idea behind it is sound. If I would've only said 'Akonadi sucks' or sth like that it would be a rather pointless post and I wouldn't have posted it. But as opposed to you, I now have my doubts whether the *idea* behind it is actually sound and Akonadi is actually used in the way it was envisioned back then. And therefor I responed in a '+1' type of way to that part of René's post in the hope to give some input to the developers for the Akonadi Next design. And given that many applications are now transitioning toward the (far) more granular and modular Frameworks 5, now seems a good time to voice my opinion on this. -- GPG: 0x138E41915C7EFED6 _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIbBAABCgAGBQJUyOfJAAoJEBOOQZFcfv7WQM0P93/Jir6/vOb5+Ux0uez+dEIw gn7vWdCh1FgbDfIeFJsdGuvxBzPGpqPiuRINiEGEcAH7QKma8byia2BHstf3s93k q3U7XgFn/4W8Hc9g3jU/Wol6gbbKLqRqgFENTE6INXDTycZJW7lyMwTL9BETFRAM 6MHFkeninD+pdDEUTDzn7TwTHhASadaOetId1UBmyKNQa46ejhZQpniBa5sCDmth skzHxt2q8FpnolnRF6GybaOQNEM7/pyt6gDRPMqSZVjW4QzHs+qImZXQBZ+pT2cN /hbtmcd/6/GlD+hbacZ+qKkCnVcQ6g//qG29ApDBnnFI+ywIUbaCEEnsAqYGr/dZ SwZc2zqbbSMbPrmTVV34y1R0kxFykrx3r1YutiGb8O8pr+i/sIMcQejc+xoXHrGc KzK3pGDCk5FdVULIlHPD6lQDkf61/yimXCx/DYipFFqPL0Gn0R8tTBlMQaymDICh MdGBAywbdPmrNs8OXyYO9eFRdWtnFi6g5rZ63kyxOI1N4pNDjpVDUXPObXUS6Jw5 jOhSj+BFnRAKH1k5DtOTCy9+rEp0mAvQtrJdlf7/KQy2ofn++iJIM9iYYl2fBqIf ZOva2BABdg+9e1CLFbajihREjqTucU9RjQnSxMlyjyxV2wP+t5o7HaUs2QnkQzQX luMR3xemktwh6EAEWPc= =Sar6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----