Re: rant

Am Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015, 14:44:41 schrieb Diederik de Haas:
> On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:12:20 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > I do not think that any "but the concept is all bad" is
> > going to help.
> > 
> > I think the main idea behind it is sound.
> 
> If I would've only said 'Akonadi sucks' or sth like that it would be a
> rather pointless post and I wouldn't have posted it.
> 
> But as opposed to you, I now have my doubts whether the *idea* behind it
> is actually sound and Akonadi is actually used in the way it was
> envisioned back then. And therefor I responed in a '+1' type of way to
> that part of René's post in the hope to give some input to the
> developers for the Akonadi Next design. And given that many
> applications are now transitioning toward the (far) more granular and
> modular Frameworks 5, now seems a good time to voice my opinion on
> this.

I think we are quite near to one another.

Actually I also think that redoing Akonadi from scratch with the lessons 
learned is a good idea. Fixing it all in place may just be more difficult 
than restarting from a clean base.

I just thought you were against some kind of Akonadi framework for 
handling stuff in the background in general, but it seems you were not.

As for feedback to developers: I am not sure whether many of them read all 
the mails here.

Ciao,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users