Re: akonadi fsck fails
Pablo Sanchez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Organization | Blueoak Database Engineering Inc |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ Comments below, in-line ] On 08/25/2015 09:45 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > Both provide the same result. From a performance perspective, (2) is better. For small sets, it won't make a difference but I like to think 'big' A NOT EXIST will more than likely need to create a work-table for its computation. Cheers, -- Pablo Sanchez - Blueoak Database Engineering, Inc Ph: 819.459.1926 Blog: http://pablo-blog.blueoakdb.com iNum: 883.5100.0990.1054 _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users