Re: Fwd: akonadi 4 & 5 not coinstallable !

[ Comments below, in-line ]


On 12/25/2015 01:31 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
>> It also appears to me that Akonadi is what drove many users nuts and away
>> >from KMail and family, in KDE4. The use of a DB store is a separate issue.
>
> It was mostly a scape goat though.
>

I agree.

I vaguely recall seeing an architectural diagram showing the use of a
central repository from which the PIM utilities would query and/or
persist data.  This is a standard architecture.

What's natural is to use a database to implement the central
repository.

Where things seemed to have gone wrong was implementing the access
layer.

For some reason, it appears a simple query translated into physically
100's if not 1000's of queries.  Given the egregious performance
issue, to me it should have been pretty simple to resolve the problem.

As a database person, I probably would not have advocated using a DBMS
for this case because when things go wrong, it's a bit cumbersome for
the lay user to troubleshoot.

Cheers,
--
Pablo Sanchez - Blueoak Database Engineering, Inc
Ph:    819.459.1926         Blog:  http://pablo-blog.blueoakdb.com
iNum:  883.5100.0990.1054

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users