Re: Akonadictl fsck

On Montag, 21. März 2016 10:17:12 CET Luis Felipe Tabera Alonso wrote:
> On lunes, 21 de marzo de 2016 9:30:05 (CET) Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > This means this is a potential data loss issue?
> > 
> > Sure, Akonadi keeps it in the database, but really, if Akonadi is
> > primarily
> > a cache it has to flush them out, not even on explicit request, but I´d
> > say
> > it has to try itself again.
> > 
> > I really think Akonadi better treats the backend storage as final location
> > for any items it stores.
> > 
> > Any plans about changing this behavior?
> > 
> > I am surprised that Akonadi still has reliability issues like this.
> > 
> > First priority I think should be to never *ever* loose any user data. For
> > that reason I think the database is not acceptable as a final destination.
> > 
> > I am willing to write a bug report about that, so that this doesn´t get
> > lost, but first I want to make sure I really understood it.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> 
> Martin,
> 
> Would it be bug #339181?

Jep, its exactly that, if you ask me.

Bug 339181 - moving mails from cached imap to local folder leaves mails 
without RID 


I even commented in there.

Thank you for bringing it up.

Ciao,
-- 
Martin
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users