Re: Akonadi disaster
Martin Steigerwald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3787521.byKJzG6fc9@merkaba> |
Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2016, 06:37:20 CEST schrieb O. Sinclair: > > I think that any mount of requesting "make KMail not use Akonadi" is a > > complete waste of energy and time and has no potential to change the > > situation of the one who does the requesting. […] > For me this started with the Plasma5 version. In whatever version I was > using in KDE4 I had very few problems, mainly to do with filtering. But > right now I have ghost mails all over, certain mails appear in different > folders, akonadi_imaap eat 20% of my CPU > > It constantly reimportant my accounts from the cache (I guess, it could > be from the database). > > And as noted, Contacts search and so on went belly up again, dist lists > are not working. Again. > > The basic problem is: it is a too complex and fragile chain that quite > often breaks on an upgrade. And that is not how an otherwise fantastic > mail client should work. > > no offence meant to the devs in any way but my hair is getting greyer by > the day at the moment as I have to go on either webmail or my android > phone to check that I am not missing out on important business mail. My main question is: Why do our experiences differ that much? Cause answering this may lead to a way which you can use to make your setup more stable instead of going through the same pain again and again. I did not recreate Akonadi setup for at least half a year, I bet even a year at least. Actually I don´t know when I last wiped my Akonadi setup. For my private mail I think it was more than a year ago, cause… it is a *ton of work* to get all the filters pointing to the right folders again (an issue I reported in bugs.kde.org). For my work related IMAP with exchange, I may have had it recreate database within the last year, but these times I usually just akonadictl fsck ; akonadictl vacuum once in a while, if at all. akonadictl vacuum is a nice way to defragment the database on BTRFS – not really needed here as I use SSDs, but I am also thankful for any byte it reclaims as my SSDs are pretty full at the moment. So while its not perfect for me for reasons I outlined, I do not see anything even remotely near the kind of catastrophic failures you see and I wonder why that is. For starters I suggest you use at least the versions of Akonadi and KMail I am using (see my other mail). Thanks, -- Martin