Re: Akonadi disaster

Martin Steigerwald <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <3787521.byKJzG6fc9@merkaba>
Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2016, 06:37:20 CEST schrieb O. Sinclair:
> > I think that any mount of requesting "make KMail not use Akonadi" is a
> > complete waste of energy and time and has no potential to change the
> > situation of the one who does the requesting.
[…]
> For me this started with the Plasma5 version. In whatever version I was 
> using in KDE4 I had very few problems, mainly to do with filtering. But 
> right now I have ghost mails all over, certain mails appear in different 
> folders, akonadi_imaap eat 20% of my CPU
> 
> It constantly reimportant my accounts from the cache (I guess, it could 
> be from the database).
> 
> And as noted, Contacts search and so on went belly up again, dist lists 
> are not working. Again.
> 
> The basic problem is: it is a too complex and fragile chain that quite 
> often breaks on an upgrade. And that is not how an otherwise fantastic 
> mail client should work.
> 
> no offence meant to the devs in any way but my hair is getting greyer by 
> the day at the moment as I have to go on either webmail or my android 
> phone to check that I am not missing out on important business mail.

My main question is:

Why do our experiences differ that much? Cause answering this may lead to a 
way which you can use to make your setup more stable instead of going through 
the same pain again and again.

I did not recreate Akonadi setup for at least half a year, I bet even a year 
at least. Actually I don´t know when I last wiped my Akonadi setup. For my 
private mail I think it was more than a year ago, cause… it is a *ton of work* 
to get all the filters pointing to the right folders again (an issue I reported 
in bugs.kde.org). For my work related IMAP with exchange, I may have had it 
recreate database within the last year, but these times I usually just 
akonadictl fsck ; akonadictl vacuum once in a while, if at all. akonadictl 
vacuum is a nice way to defragment the database on BTRFS – not really needed 
here as I use SSDs, but I am also thankful for any byte it reclaims as my SSDs 
are pretty full at the moment.

So while its not perfect for me for reasons I outlined, I do not see anything 
even remotely near the kind of catastrophic failures you see and I wonder why 
that is. For starters I suggest you use at least the versions of Akonadi and 
KMail I am using (see my other mail).

Thanks,
-- 
Martin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.