Re: Goodbye for now, kmail
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <16087625.XqjEviCjME@bola> |
On Saturday May 06 2017 11:20:39 Anders Lund wrote: >Both claws mail and thunderbird displays a mail when asked to. They do >not have the BSOD "feature" of kmail. Probably, no other email client Bsod? If only it were still blue and not something that also makes your eyes bleed ... ;) On Saturday May 06 2017 11:31:20 Anders Lund wrote: >Akonadi does not work for (IMAP) mail. It may be that it can be tweaked >to somewhat work in specific cases, if the peers like mail servers are >carefully chosen, but it is not a functional solution in general. > >The only sane thing to do, is to deakonadify kmail. I wonder, how open is KDEPIM to adding an optional IMAP agent that doesn't rely on Akonadi? That could provide a compromise: continue to support and develop the Akonadi infrastructure but users will have a choice for IMAP between something (probably simpler) that just works and a default that's somewhat top-heavy O:^) R.