Re: Goodbye for now, kmail
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1761728.KgTZRhm9kj@bola> |
On Saturday May 06 2017 12:19:37 Anders Lund wrote: >På Sat, 06 May 2017 12:07:22 +0200 >Daniel Vrátil <[email protected]> skrev: >> You have Trojita and Sink, both support IMAP and don't use Akonadi. >> There's no way to add IMAP to KMail without using Akonadi. > >No? I can't imagine this is due to technical reasons, so it must be >religious. Depends, would patches be accepted that introduce the possibility to use 3rd-party non-Akonadi agents/plugins? Or maybe one can write a 3rd party IMAP alternative that communicates with KMail via the existing Akonadi channels but uses its own backend? >So a fork may be the way to go? >Kmail worked fine without akonadi for many years. Use KMail from the Trinity desktop, supposing the Trinity devs have managed to keep Qt3 alive and kicking? >Trojita at this point in time is not usable for my purpose, I evaluated >that two times, latest a few weeks ago. Second that. It's probably a nice educational project for its author(s) but without interest for anyone with modern email needs or simply multiple addresses. >Sink I didn't hear of, and thus not evaluate. I did, as in I looked at Kube a few months ago. It works but when I discovered it stores my passwords in clear I kicked it off my system. I don't think that's Sink's fault, but Sink alone doesn't get you very far. R.