Re: Goodbye for now, kmail

René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <1761728.KgTZRhm9kj@bola>
On Saturday May 06 2017 12:19:37 Anders Lund wrote:
>På Sat, 06 May 2017 12:07:22 +0200
>Daniel Vrátil <[email protected]> skrev:
>> You have Trojita and Sink, both support IMAP and don't use Akonadi.
>> There's no way to add IMAP to KMail without using Akonadi.
>
>No? I can't imagine this is due to technical reasons, so it must be
>religious.

Depends, would patches be accepted that introduce the possibility to use 3rd-party non-Akonadi agents/plugins?

Or maybe one can write a 3rd party IMAP alternative that communicates with KMail via the existing Akonadi channels but uses its own backend?

>So a fork may be the way to go?
>Kmail worked fine without akonadi for many years.

Use KMail from the Trinity desktop, supposing the Trinity devs have managed to keep Qt3 alive and kicking?

>Trojita at this point in time is not usable for my purpose, I evaluated
>that two times, latest a few weeks ago. 

Second that. It's probably a nice educational project for its author(s) but without interest for anyone with modern email needs or simply multiple addresses.

>Sink I didn't hear of, and thus not evaluate.

I did, as in I looked at Kube a few months ago. It works but when I discovered it stores my passwords in clear I kicked it off my system. I don't think that's Sink's fault, but Sink alone doesn't get you very far.

R.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.