Re: Goodbye for now, kmail

Martin Steigerwald <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <1663335.dBVMTzT0ju@merkaba>
Ingo Klöcker - 06.05.17, 10:37:
> KMail has been improved a lot (even with paid contracts) for enterprise 
> users. And enterprise users usually use IMAP. Enterprise power users 
> probably use server-side filtering and normal enterprise users (from my 
> experience) don't filter their mail at all automatically. Moreover, for 
> most enterprise users the latency to the IMAP server is extremely low. I 
> guess those are all reasons why IMAP works quite well (with decent IMAP 
> servers and not too huge folders).

I can easily proof performance related issues with fast Dovecot IMAP server up 
to Akonadi 16.04. Like the folder synchronisation after pressing delete key on 
5-10 mails in a folder. This is an IMAP server on a VM on enterprise hardware 
and it also happens through low latency network access. However I see the VM 
doing heavy I/O – and there may be some I/O bottleneck on the VM that is 
delaying this. I think it has to do with Akonadi asking the IMAP server to 
deliver at least the UIDs for even larger folder on every attempt to 
synchronize the folder.

As a user I would be happy with the following synchronisation behaviour:

- Only synchronize a folder when I access it.
- Then keep that folder somewhat updated for as long as I access it. I think 
this should be setable. For one folder like INBOX it is easy enough cause PUSH 
can be used.
- Never ever synchronize other folders, even when filtering mails into them.

Hopefully that maildir folder move is completed after maybe 1 hour at least, 
mysqld still using 100% of one core.

-- 
Martin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.