Re: Goodbye for now, kmail
Martin Steigerwald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1663335.dBVMTzT0ju@merkaba> |
Ingo Klöcker - 06.05.17, 10:37: > KMail has been improved a lot (even with paid contracts) for enterprise > users. And enterprise users usually use IMAP. Enterprise power users > probably use server-side filtering and normal enterprise users (from my > experience) don't filter their mail at all automatically. Moreover, for > most enterprise users the latency to the IMAP server is extremely low. I > guess those are all reasons why IMAP works quite well (with decent IMAP > servers and not too huge folders). I can easily proof performance related issues with fast Dovecot IMAP server up to Akonadi 16.04. Like the folder synchronisation after pressing delete key on 5-10 mails in a folder. This is an IMAP server on a VM on enterprise hardware and it also happens through low latency network access. However I see the VM doing heavy I/O – and there may be some I/O bottleneck on the VM that is delaying this. I think it has to do with Akonadi asking the IMAP server to deliver at least the UIDs for even larger folder on every attempt to synchronize the folder. As a user I would be happy with the following synchronisation behaviour: - Only synchronize a folder when I access it. - Then keep that folder somewhat updated for as long as I access it. I think this should be setable. For one folder like INBOX it is easy enough cause PUSH can be used. - Never ever synchronize other folders, even when filtering mails into them. Hopefully that maildir folder move is completed after maybe 1 hour at least, mysqld still using 100% of one core. -- Martin