Re: Goodbye for now, kmail

René J.V. Bertin - 06.05.17, 11:49:
> On Saturday May 06 2017 11:31:20 Anders Lund wrote:
> >Akonadi does not work for (IMAP) mail. It may be that it can be tweaked
> >to somewhat work in specific cases, if the peers like mail servers are
> >carefully chosen, but it is not a functional solution in general. 
> >
> >The only sane thing to do, is to deakonadify kmail.
> 
> I wonder, how open is KDEPIM to adding an optional IMAP agent that doesn't
> rely on Akonadi? That could provide a compromise: continue to support and
> develop the Akonadi infrastructure but users will have a choice for IMAP
> between something (probably simpler) that just works and a default that's
> somewhat top-heavy O:^)

Now *who* would be the developer(s) of that IMAP agent?

-- 
Martin