Re: Goodbye for now, kmail
Gianluca Montecchi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20170509125640.GA23366@valkyrie> |
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 01:08:55PM +0100, ianseeks wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 09:11:59 BST Gianluca Montecchi wrote: > > > > Technical reasons aside, the big problem here is that the KDEPIM > > developers have not learned anything from the KDE4 initial release > > fiasco, so they repeated it: release basically an alpha version as > > "ready for the end users", which in my experience is way far from the > > thruth. > > The so called "KDE4 fiasco" was down to the distro's releasing it too soon, not > the KDE team. The KDE said the release was for devs to port their software so > blame the distros. On the kde site the 4.0.0 is not a a Release candidate nor a Beta. Nothing in the release announcement still on the KDE site state that the 4.0 release is aimed to the developers other than a generic "For those interested in getting packages to test and contribute....", which in a wording or another is present in all the announcements. But also if, as I can agree, the problem was not by the KDE team but the distros, the way it was managed was a fiasco. But at least with the KDE 4.0 you have a clear path to downgrade and still able to work. With the new KDEPIM no, once you have akonadi there is no way to return a pre-akonadi version and this, in my opinion, is/was the biggest problem. Ok, I know of Trinity, but to me it seems stupid to ditch the now stable kde4/plasma5 just to have a working kmail installation: it is way better to ditch kmail and install claw/thunderbird/whatever. And I am also looking into Kube, but until there is no support for POP3 is a no-go for me. bye Gianluca