Re: kmail sigh

On Monday, 29 January 2018 12:04:57 GMT Pablo Sanchez wrote:
> [ Comments below, in-line ]
> 
> 
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:45:59 +0100, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> 
>  > [ trimmed ]
>  >
> > Did anyone have made a measurement for the different back ends?
> 
> ;)
> 
> AFAIK, it's only been 'feelings' that it's faster.  I'm with you, it 
> shouldn't make a difference which back-end you use.  But as I had not 
> performed any data collection, I have just kept quiet.  :p
Its not just a feeling with akonadictl operations, its a lot faster but with kmail itself, it does seem a little faster so that might be subjective.

> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Pablo Sanchez - Blueoak Database Engineering, Inc
> Ph:    819.459.1926        iNum:  883.5100.0990.1054
> 
> 


-- 
opensuse:tumbleweed:20180127
Qt: 5.10.0 KDE Frameworks: 5.42.0 - KDE Plasma:  5.11.95 - kwin 5.11.95
kmail2 5.7.1 - akonadiserver 5.7.1 - Kernel:  4.14.15-1-default  - xf86-video-nouveau:  1.0.15