Re: Quick question for interest's sake

Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <5557732.kEbpPDVrK0@thufir>
On Mittwoch, 7. März 2018 14:17:27 CET Erik Quaeghebeur wrote:
> On woensdag 7 maart 2018 13:23:53 CET, Ian Seeks wrote:
> > Why do none of the emails in this list from
> > <[email protected]> with the same subject ever form a
> > thread?

Ian, did you probably confused this list (kdepim-users) with the kde-pim list?


> I haven't seen any phabricator mails on this list, but my guess would be
> that phabricator does not (correctly?) set the In-Reply-To and References
> headers used for threading.
> 
> I do not know which threading algorithm KMail uses, but a well-known one is
> Jamie Zawinski's <https://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html>.

I haven't check what Jamie Zawinski writes.

If the "Standard Mailing List" aggregration is enabled, then KMail threads (in 
this order of preference) by:
1.) In-Reply-To
2.) References
3.) Subject

A message that is threaded by Subject is put under the message that is closest 
in date.


> By having a look at the phabricator mails' headers, you can probably see
> what is going on and, if something can be corrected or improved, file a bug
> report
> <https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabcontrib/article/bug_reports/>.

Here are some headers of such a message:

=====
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-pnagm7x6ynd2f6dss5zr-
[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-pnagm7x6ynd2f6dss5zr-
[email protected]>
=====

All Message-Id headers seem to have the same pattern. All messages belonging 
to the same Phabricator issue (e.g. a review request) seem to have identical 
References and In-Reply-To headers. Obviously, their format is completely 
different from the Message-Id headers.

So, it's not surprising that KMail is not able to thread the messages by In-
Reply-To or References. I don't understand why KMail doesn't thread by subject 
instead.


Regards,
Ingo
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQRxKgkQMhrHYtSAVAgadH5FMOC52AUCWqBAowAKCRAadH5FMOC5
2H7DAKC9LY48sQNrk5+ySQLjHQldZfX+CACffNbRMS3VZWHcPsLqValWNThFsyU=
=fB67
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.