Re: So I think I found my new mails...
Paul Vixie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ingo Klöcker wrote: > ... > > Reminder: On this KDE mailing list, as everywhere else KDE (mailing lists, > forums, wikis, etc.), you have to abide to the KDE Community Code of Conduct > (https://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/). In short: > * Be considerate > * Be respectful > * Be collaborative > * Be pragmatic > * Support others in the community > * Get support from others in the community > > ... > > ..., some of the messages in this thread are neither considerate, nor > respectful, nor collaborative. In future, be considerate, respectful, and > collaborative towards other members of the KDE community. since i've already apologized for being inconsiderate up-thread, i won't delve into that topic. i do want to clarify one matter. several kmail-loving users have reported being unable to use kontact as much after the akonadi change as they did before. some of us say not at all, some of us say only for pgp, some of us say we bought more hardware and bandwidth and just continued. and yes, some of us were not respectful in how we described our experiences, but i think that's been dealt with (variously.) to the extent that the response is, it works for the devs so there's no problem, or please file more bug reports because we still don't accept the existence of a problem, or there may or may not be a problem but you may not complain about it lest you be seen as non-collaborative, or you may not criticize the process or culture or team who brought us to this point... such responses have been quite non-collaborative, however pragmatic, respectful, or considerate they also were. an important step on the way to solving a problem is admitting it exists. the calibration input i call your attention to is that the complaints are coming from people who love kmail and miss being able to use it -- not haters. -- P Vixie