Re: An odd debug message
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <17314803.ybgkhHsm9e@thufir> |
On Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2018 11:24:40 CEST Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Thursday, 25 October 2018 09:35:44 BST René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > Of course it's probably complete overkill that daemon processes would > > initialise a resource hog like QtWebEngine instead of using the much more > > appropriate QtWebKit but I'm afraid the powers have decided they wish to > > ignore that. > > No comment needed from me. ;) But from me, as (no longer actively programming) member of the KDE PIM team and as moderator of this mailing list: Please refrain from making uninformed allusions and claims. I perceive them as unfriendly and detrimental for the motivation of the tiny group of still active KDE PIM developers. Fact is that we were more or less forced to switch because the Qt project deprecated Qt WebKit in Qt 5.5 [1] and removed it from the official release packages in Qt 5.6 [2]. Since web engines are a mayor attack target, we didn't really have much choice. Regards, Ingo [1] https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.5#Deprecated_Functionality [2] https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.6#Removed_Modules
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iFwEABECAB0WIQRxKgkQMhrHYtSAVAgadH5FMOC52AUCW9I0CQAKCRAadH5FMOC5 2HFgAJd+SX8PyvgXTHjSXZKz3e0SfQ9hAJ4jtAO69M1zFpS6Dw5vGU7MPcc0XA== =qDje -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----