Re: Part 2 of any progress on kmail in debian buster?

John White <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Organization lawquest
Message-ID <2025955.xs5469Z5YJ@johwhi>
Paul,

Though kmail2 is massively better than it was, I am still having some (very few) 
kmail2 problems, Sp i am planning on making the switch to pgsql this coming 
weekend, following your suggestions in earlier emails.  I have kmails back to at least 
2000.  Do you have some idea of how much of that old stuff is going to be affected 
if I make the switch from mysql to pgsql?

John

> 

> On Monday, September 30, 2019 7:40:06 AM PDT Paul Vixie wrote:
> test wrote on 2019-09-30 06:16:
> >On Friday, September 27, 2019 12:16:03 PM CEST Paul Vixie wrote:
> > i am following the advice given in the attached, and i lose no e-mail.
>  
> > Seriously?  This advice tells you that kmail is totally broken and
> > shouldn't be used at all.
> > 
> with mysql that is so.
> > 
> > Is kmail still that bad after 20 years or so?  If so, I won't use kmail
> > anymore --- after just starting to use it.
> 
> with pgsql all is well.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.