Re: Part 2 of any progress on kmail in debian buster?
John White <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Organization | lawquest |
| Message-ID | <2025955.xs5469Z5YJ@johwhi> |
Paul, Though kmail2 is massively better than it was, I am still having some (very few) kmail2 problems, Sp i am planning on making the switch to pgsql this coming weekend, following your suggestions in earlier emails. I have kmails back to at least 2000. Do you have some idea of how much of that old stuff is going to be affected if I make the switch from mysql to pgsql? John > > On Monday, September 30, 2019 7:40:06 AM PDT Paul Vixie wrote: > test wrote on 2019-09-30 06:16: > >On Friday, September 27, 2019 12:16:03 PM CEST Paul Vixie wrote: > > i am following the advice given in the attached, and i lose no e-mail. > > > Seriously? This advice tells you that kmail is totally broken and > > shouldn't be used at all. > > > with mysql that is so. > > > > Is kmail still that bad after 20 years or so? If so, I won't use kmail > > anymore --- after just starting to use it. > > with pgsql all is well.