Re: Item "255451" in collection "108" has no RID.

On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 5:27:24 PM CEST Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Dear Werner, dear community,
> 
> Werner Joss - 20.05.20, 17:08:46 CEST:
> > Am Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2020, 13:52:06 CEST schrieb René J.V. Bertin:
> > > >just a side note:
> > > >I tried https://kube-project.com/ some time ago, which worked quite
> > > >impressively then, without any akonadi* stuff whatsoever
> > > 
> > > When I tried it it had no kwallet integration, and it had a QML
> > > interface. The former is resolved by now, hopefully, the latter
> > > probably not - it's something you have to appreciate (the "speed",
> > > and the mobile-style design.
> > 
> > Yes, the style is more like mobile, that's true.
> > Speed was ok for my use case.
> > I'm currently still on kmail (5.14.1) which works quite ok here, with
> > some glitches. I'll keep an eye on kube, though...
> 
> I think Sink has potential. But at the moment it does not even come
> close to feature parity with Akonadi. Does it need all its features?
> Very likely not. However… as I am still using POP3 and also if I switch
> to IMAP would prefer to move older mails to local storage instead of
> having years of mail history sit on my server, it currently is no option
> for me.

What's bad about having the messages on your server?  If you use cyrus, it's 
at least as reliable as maildir.

> [...]
> That all written, probably time for me to test out Kube myself. I bet it
> is blazingly fast.

Have you tried mutt?  It's probably the fastest option.