Re: Does KMail require Akonadi? (was: Re: Frustrating to use KMail with Akonadi 5.14.1 (20.04))
"Hakan E. Duran" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20200703170730.n7vq67xfua3sv43v@shemstebrizi> |
On 20/07/02 08:02AM, [email protected] wrote: > ... > So, my question is this -- if I'd upgrade to Buster and try to use the kmail > version there (5.9.3), how likely am I to have problems? >... My humble answer to your question is "quite likely". I would suggest trying the new set up in a VM or a spare computer if you have that luxury first. Then you can make an informed decision yourself. Hakan
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQQ1r0YDipu7hRe+eDe7laopA9QLSwUCXv9l0QAKCRC7laopA9QL S9qnAJ9w0x94fZHdLTqnxRCyAZRHpneV7gCfVYwTpRUVKhz4UJLPnv7YL7hLygA= =hE/W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----