Re: Unhappy with Akonadi
Ianseeks <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Organization | at home |
| Message-ID | <2074372.83kSWZmUM3@lianli> |
On Tuesday, 28 September 2021 22:39:08 BST Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Martin Steigerwald - 12.09.21, 17:52:14 CEST: > > I use PostgreSQL. > > > > Still it often enough is unbearable. > > > > One IMAP account that I limited from 30 to 7 days server-side by using > > "find -delete", cause Akonadi would just insist to synchronize inbox > > needlessly a lot of times, blocking deleting mails and moving mails > > in KMail for even for local maildir access for minutes and longer. > > In addition to that displaying a folder with about 40000 mails is still > very slow before KMail shows anything. I'm just guessing here. I find kmail a lot slower when you have display formatting like threading etc on the folders because kmail seems to reformat the view when you enter the folder for the first time. > Thus I moved some 13000 mails to a different folder and waited more than > 7 minutes for that operation to complete: > > [Akonadi] [Bug 443095] New: Moving mails to a different folder is very > slow > > https://bugs.kde.org/443095 > > I really hope one day I am able to use KMail without micro managing > things for having a performance that is at least barely bearable. > > This is on a ThinkPad T14 AMD Gen 1 with AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 8 core > processor with hyperthreading, 32 GiB of RAM and 2TB Samsung 980 Pro > SSD. Taking more than 7 minutes to move 13000 mails on that machine > without even utilizing at least one full core to the maximum and without > even using the SSD to its full capability is kind of ridiculous. > > Especially when KMail is basically not usable for anything else during > that operation. > > I know every developer works on what they like. And I am grateful for > any improvement they implement. It is not on me to tell what they should > do. Yet I still think that it would be best to stop all feature work on > KDEPIM and Akonadi and fix the outstanding performance and reliability > issues first. > > It is not that any of these issues are new. They are there since the > switch of KDEPIM to be Akonadi based. > > Best, > -- opensuse:tumbleweed:20210928 Qt: 5.15.2 KDE Frameworks: 5.86.0 - KDE Plasma: 5.22.5 - kwin 5.22.5 kmail2 5.18.1 (21.08.1) - akonadiserver 5.18.1 (21.08.1) - Kernel: 5.14.6-1-default - xf86-video-nouveau: 1.0.17