Re: Akonadi with PostgreSQL 14 (was: Re: Unhappy with Akonadi)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6086297.82JnTjM8ia@thunder> |
On Sonntag, 7. November 2021 16:49:09 CET Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Dear Michael. > > [email protected] - 07.11.21, 13:41:50 CET: > > On Samstag, 6. November 2021 15:51:47 CET Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > Bjoern Bidar - 06.11.21, 15:38:20 CET: > > > > Which database backend are you using? Switching from MySQL to > > > > PostgreSQ helped me to improve performance and memory usage. > > > > > > Actually I wrote that I use PostgreSQL in the first sentence of my > > > post. > > > > > > PostgreSQL 13 still. But can move to 14 as well. Anyone using > > > PostgreSQL 14 with Akonadi yet? > > > > I tested with PSql 14, but had to revert to 13 due to a few problems. > > What problems? Would be good to know and probably report, so they can be > fixed. > > Best, there wasn't a single problem, that could be described exactly. Akonadi was much slower than with PSQL 13. Kmail crashed more often than usual, especially when acting on really large folders. I wasn't sure, if the reason was PSQL 14 or a newer version of Kmail, so I reverted to PSQL 13. Because the problems went away then, I didn't take the time to step forward to PSQL 14 again to reproduce and report the problems. Bye. Michael.