Re: Akonadi with PostgreSQL 14 (was: Re: Unhappy with Akonadi)

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <6086297.82JnTjM8ia@thunder>
On Sonntag, 7. November 2021 16:49:09 CET Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Dear Michael.
> 
> [email protected] - 07.11.21, 13:41:50 CET:
> > On Samstag, 6. November 2021 15:51:47 CET Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > Bjoern Bidar - 06.11.21, 15:38:20 CET:
> > > > Which database backend are you using? Switching from MySQL to
> > > > PostgreSQ helped me to improve performance and memory usage.
> > > 
> > > Actually I wrote that I use PostgreSQL in the first sentence of my
> > > post.
> > > 
> > > PostgreSQL 13 still. But can move to 14 as well. Anyone using
> > > PostgreSQL 14 with Akonadi yet?
> > 
> > I tested with PSql 14, but had to revert to 13 due to a few problems.
> 
> What problems? Would be good to know and probably report, so they can be
> fixed.
> 
> Best,

there wasn't a single problem, that could be described exactly.
Akonadi was much slower than with PSQL 13. Kmail crashed more often than 
usual, especially when acting on really large folders.
I wasn't sure, if the reason was PSQL 14 or a newer version of Kmail, so I 
reverted to PSQL 13. Because the problems went away then, I didn't take the 
time to step forward to PSQL 14 again to reproduce and report the problems.

Bye.
Michael.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.