Re: no changes here, but I am drowning in duplicates today

gene heskett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Organization only accidental
Message-ID <10622244.NVHto71C3G@coyote>
On Sunday, 1 May 2022 20:21:25 EDT gene heskett wrote:
> kmail recognizes them and won't show them except as ghosted in the
> meggade list, but the unread count still counts them.
> 
> Running a dup remove might reduce the count from 71 to 5 in a given
> folder. Hitting the + key skips to the next folder even if 14 unreads
> are shown in the high-lighted folder list. And I'm wearing out my
> mouse deleting new copies of stuff I read this morning.
> 
> Ideas? I'm plumb out.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

And maybe I fixed it, or not. I started akonadi-console, looked at all 
the stuff in the right pulldown but didn't actually do anything but look, 
and the unread will now go to zero before it hops to the next folder with 
unread content. But that only lasted till the next scan of the imap 
server, running dovecot at mailtoworld2, so the duplicated messages 
continue unabated.  Looking at the server with firefox, there are NO 
duplicates showing there, only here.

So I'm still puzzled. Is there something I should watch with akonadi-
console that would help show whats going on?

Thanks.


> Cheers, Gene Heskett.
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
> If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law
> respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis
> 
> 
> 
> .


Cheers, Gene Heskett.
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.