Re: Webapp-Antlet: First version

Hi,

> - I think it should be called "webapp".
Fine

> - I think all irrelevant files should should be left out (eg. status.xml).
Jap, this is no big deal

> - The hard part is probably filling the lib dir with jars from ruper (from
> dependencies in module.xml), but that can be left out until
> ruper/dependencies are working.
That's true. But there's a common ground with the java antlet (building 
the dist), so I think we can implement this feature nearly the same.

> It seems right to create small initial versions and leave standardisation of
> build directories, generated doc directories,  lib dir construction,
> documentation etc. until there's a small collection of working antlets.
What do you mean by this exactly? The current Structure of the Template?

Regards

Micha




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click