Re: Re: Performance
Travis Reeder <[email protected]> Fri, 14 May 2004 00:04:22 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.krysalis.jcharts.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ok, good to know. I'll do what the last email said about doing a mockup and see how it feels and let y'all know how it goes. Travis Chris McKay wrote: >Speaking as the author of the message about performance details what >those results meant was don't run a heavily used web app on a PIII with >500Mb of memory and Oracle and iPlanet LDAP running at the same time ... > >The production figures (dual Xeon, 4Gb) showed 7 charts a second being >generated. Our extranet web app (not heavily used in terms of hits per >second) has pages that display 30 pie charts at a time. You can beat the >draw speed with a scrollbar but they fill in pretty quickly. > >The other thing the performance figures show is that jCharts is one of >the faster Java charting engines (versus jFreeCharts and a commercial >package) > >Chris > > > >>Interesting. So based on that, it may not be the best choice for a >>heavily used web app, say if you had several charts on each page, then >>the page would take fairly long (in web terms) to load since it takes >>over a second at best to create a chart? Would be nice to allow the >>actual chart drawing to be done on the client somehow, guess that might >> >> > > > >>have to be flash. Or can SVG do that? >> >> > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband >Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest >6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click >_______________________________________________ >jCharts-users mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jcharts-users > >. > > >