Re: Krysalis Version project

Adam Jack wrote:

>Ok, I agree -- enthusiastically -- release early, release often -- I'd like
>to do a 1.0.1 that contains
>(primarily) the ant tasks.  [After than I'll work on Ruper integration, and
>more Version 'styles' -- such as Maven's -- related items.]
>
>Ok, so how do I 'release'? If the Nick's gump build tonight works, and
>generates/uploads a site we ought
>have a site, a distribution, ant tasks, and some documentation [which I will
>keep working on]. 
>
Documentation is looking good.  I will touch up some things,  hopefully 
gump will publish tonight..

>We have unit tests that test these ant tasks work, and
>they pass. Is that enough for a release? Do we need 'release notes'?
>  
>
Yes

>Can this have a release whilst in the sandbox?
>  
>
Yes it is fine

>BTW: I'd love to have a 'cent' in the first release, like the one that Nick
>started, unfortunately that is not in my control and I don't know if Nick
>has time to help me. As such I am flexible for either way. Anou's Eclipse
>plug-in works (for her/I) but I don't want to pressure her to 'certify' it
>for this release, so I am game for with or without.
>  
>
The cent task will be easy.  I hope to get to it tonight.

>regards
>
>Adam
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Krysalis-sandbox-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/krysalis-sandbox-dev
>  
>




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf