RE: Problem with Centipede

Nikunj wrote:

>  Thanx guys. It worked. It had to do with Xalan. I re-checked on your
suggestion and I was not including it in a proper way.

Glad to hear that!

>  Thanx for your suggestion Adam. I really like the idea. But currently I
am pressed with time ... <snip>

No need to explain. Probably best to wait a little while longer anyway, give
Nick a change to track down the classloader thing in ant, and us to get a
new release out. We'll want feedback on (1) the transition process [mental
and environment] (2) documentation (lots of names changes, cent -> antlib)
and we'd appreciate your comments then.

>  ANT is good and centipede gives it even more power. I think centipede is
interesting.

That kinda sums up my views also -- and why I use centipede. 

Question #1: do you have your own jar repository yet? I think that takes
Ruper benefit to a whole new level.
Question #2: have you written  you own cent yet (i.e. put your home grown
code in to that framework?) I think that takes Centipede benefit to a whole
new level. 

I'd do these two before moving to the new centipede, they give you a deeper
insight/appreciation for centipede.

>  What progress has been made with respect to using Centipede/ANT for cpp
projects.

I think Alex has been busy recently. Alex?

regards,

Adam